Home Email This page Print Bookmark
Options


 

Increases in Cook County Residential Property Tax Bills Due in Large Part to Tax Burden Shift

Share

December 15, 2010

By Ares G. Dalianis and Scott R. Metcalf

The 2009 Cook County second installment property tax bills that were due earlier this week contained increases that came as a shock to many homeowners.  As a result, many school district officials have been asked to explain the increases.  While the exact causes of higher tax bills will vary from property to property, the final results of the 2009 reassessment indicate that, in the aggregate, residential property increased as a percentage of the overall assessment base, which translates to a larger percentage of the overall tax burden falling on residential property owners.

The latest information on the 2009 reassessment indicates that while the total assessed value for Class 2 (Residential) property declined, the assessed value of Class 5 (commercial/industrial) property declined more.  The result is that the tax base was comprised of a higher percentage of residential property value in 2009 than in 2008.  The Final Assessment Abstracts for the 2008 and 2009 tax years, obtained from the Cook County Assessor’s Office, indicate that residential properties' share of the assessment base increased in all areas of the County.

COUNTYWIDE

2008

 

2009

 

AV

% Tax
Base

 

 

AV

% Tax
Base

Class 1 - All

853,313,625

1.2%

 

Class 1 - All

565,782,355

0.9%

Class 2 - All

45,036,821,173

62.2%

 

Class 2 - All

41,962,772,641

64.5%

Class 3 - All

2,328,329,683

3.2%

 

Class 3 - All

2,466,526,923

3.8%

Class 4 - All

223,734,218

0.3%

 

Class 4 - All

194,682,407

0.3%

Class 5 - All

23,468,201,153

32.4%

 

Class 5 - All

19,344,148,226

29.8%

Class 6 - All

310,897,397

0.4%

 

Class 6 - All

241,663,015

0.4%

Class 7 - All

28,473,840

0.0%

 

Class 7 - All

40,772,027

0.1%

Class 8 - All

29,113,067

0.0%

 

Class 8 - All

32,141,954

0.0%

Class 9 - All

178,514,326

0.2%

 

Class 9 - All

167,543,440

0.3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

72,457,398,482

100.0%

 

Total

65,016,032,988

100.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOUTH TRIAD

2008

 

2009

 

AV

% Tax
Base

 

 

AV

% Tax
Base

Class 1 - All

256,727,292

1.7%

 

Class 1 - All

139,823,801

1.1%

Class 2 - All

10,080,895,857

68.1%

 

Class 2 - All

9,369,495,275

72.0%

Class 3 - All

283,124,556

1.9%

 

Class 3 - All

254,928,244

2.0%

Class 4 - All

40,475,665

0.3%

 

Class 4 - All

35,589,380

0.3%

Class 5 - All

3,951,267,476

26.7%

 

Class 5 - All

3,066,221,489

23.6%

Class 6 - All

115,236,840

0.8%

 

Class 6 - All

89,615,956

0.7%

Class 7 - All

916,856

0.0%

 

Class 7 - All

677,482

0.0%

Class 8 - All

29,113,067

0.2%

 

Class 8 - All

32,141,954

0.2%

Class 9 - All

34,696,254

0.2%

 

Class 9 - All

28,898,094

0.2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

14,792,453,863

100.0%

 

Total

13,017,391,675

100.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NORTH TRIAD

2008

 

2009

 

AV

% Tax
Base

 

 

AV

% Tax
Base

Class 1 - All

212,676,731

0.9%

 

Class 1 - All

120,757,902

0.6%

Class 2 - All

15,616,351,765

66.0%

 

Class 2 - All

14,281,296,304

69.5%

Class 3 - All

442,436,551

1.9%

 

Class 3 - All

398,750,371

1.9%

Class 4 - All

90,882,903

0.4%

 

Class 4 - All

80,023,797

0.4%

Class 5 - All

7,157,396,848

30.2%

 

Class 5 - All

5,557,682,869

27.0%

Class 6 - All

137,994,951

0.6%

 

Class 6 - All

111,390,787

0.5%

Class 7 - All

241,120

0.0%

 

Class 7 - All

398,017

0.0%

Class 8 - All

 

0.0%

 

Class 8 - All

 

0.0%

Class 9 - All

11,845,913

0.1%

 

Class 9 - All

10,903,696

0.1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

23,669,826,782

100.0%

 

Total

20,561,203,743

100.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CITY TRIAD

2008

 

2009

 

AV

% Tax
Base

 

 

AV

% Tax
Base

Class 1 - All

383,909,602

1.1%

 

Class 1 - All

305,200,662

1.0%

Class 2 - All

19,339,573,551

56.9%

 

Class 2 - All

18,311,981,062

58.2%

Class 3 - All

1,602,768,576

4.7%

 

Class 3 - All

1,812,850,308

5.8%

Class 4 - All

92,375,650

0.3%

 

Class 4 - All

79,069,230

0.3%

Class 5 - All

12,359,536,829

36.4%

 

Class 5 - All

10,720,243,858

34.1%

Class 6 - All

57,665,606

0.2%

 

Class 6 - All

40,656,272

0.1%

Class 7 - All

27,315,864

0.1%

 

Class 7 - All

39,696,528

0.1%

Class 8 - All

 

0.0%

 

Class 8 - All

 

0.0%

Class 9 - All

131,972,159

0.4%

 

Class 9 - All

127,741,650

0.4%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

33,995,117,837

100.0%

 

Total

31,437,439,570

100.0%

Source:   Cook County Assessor’s Office, Final Abstract of 2008 Assessment and Final Abstract of 2009 Assessment

The most likely explanation for this shift in the composition of the assessment base is the implementation of new levels of assessment for the various classes of property during the 2009 assessment year and the subsequent appeals filed at the Cook County Board of Review.  In 2008, the Cook County Board of Commissioners amended the County’s Real Property Assessment Classification Ordinance to revise all assessment levels to either 10% or 25% of fair market value.  The following changes were implemented for the 2009 assessment year:

Class

Property Type

New Level of
Assessment (%)

Old Level of
Assessment (%)

1

Vacant Land

10

22

2

Residential

10

16

3

Apartments

16 (2009)
13 (2010)
10 (2011)

20

4

Non-Profit

25

30

5A

Commercial

25

38

5B

Industrial

25

36

Incentives

Various

10

16

Additionally, the Cook County Board of Review initiated “Restoration Appeals” in order to allow property owners to make their case for consistent market values after the new levels of assessment were implemented.  These appeals were filed by many commercial and industrial property owners to obtain the benefit of the reduced assessment levels.

It is important to note that changes in the composition of the assessment base are beyond the control of school districts.  School districts have control only over their levies, which were limited by the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law (PTELL) to an increase of only 0.1% for 2009.  Thus, it is the assessment and assessment review processes that determine who pays how much of those levies. 

More Information