Increases in Cook County Residential Property Tax Bills Due in Large Part to Tax Burden Shift
December 15, 2010
By Ares G. Dalianis and Scott R. Metcalf
The 2009 Cook County second installment property tax bills that were due earlier this week contained increases that came as a shock to many homeowners. As a result, many school district officials have been asked to explain the increases. While the exact causes of higher tax bills will vary from property to property, the final results of the 2009 reassessment indicate that, in the aggregate, residential property increased as a percentage of the overall assessment base, which translates to a larger percentage of the overall tax burden falling on residential property owners.
The latest information on the 2009 reassessment indicates that while the total assessed value for Class 2 (Residential) property declined, the assessed value of Class 5 (commercial/industrial) property declined more. The result is that the tax base was comprised of a higher percentage of residential property value in 2009 than in 2008. The Final Assessment Abstracts for the 2008 and 2009 tax years, obtained from the Cook County Assessor’s Office, indicate that residential properties' share of the assessment base increased in all areas of the County.
|
COUNTYWIDE
| ||||||
|
2008
|
|
2009
| ||||
|
|
AV
|
% Tax |
|
|
AV
|
% Tax |
|
Class 1 - All
|
853,313,625
|
1.2%
|
|
Class 1 - All
|
565,782,355
|
0.9%
|
|
Class 2 - All
|
45,036,821,173
|
62.2%
|
|
Class 2 - All
|
41,962,772,641
|
64.5%
|
|
Class 3 - All
|
2,328,329,683
|
3.2%
|
|
Class 3 - All
|
2,466,526,923
|
3.8%
|
|
Class 4 - All
|
223,734,218
|
0.3%
|
|
Class 4 - All
|
194,682,407
|
0.3%
|
|
Class 5 - All
|
23,468,201,153
|
32.4%
|
|
Class 5 - All
|
19,344,148,226
|
29.8%
|
|
Class 6 - All
|
310,897,397
|
0.4%
|
|
Class 6 - All
|
241,663,015
|
0.4%
|
|
Class 7 - All
|
28,473,840
|
0.0%
|
|
Class 7 - All
|
40,772,027
|
0.1%
|
|
Class 8 - All
|
29,113,067
|
0.0%
|
|
Class 8 - All
|
32,141,954
|
0.0%
|
|
Class 9 - All
|
178,514,326
|
0.2%
|
|
Class 9 - All
|
167,543,440
|
0.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
72,457,398,482
|
100.0%
|
|
Total
|
65,016,032,988
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOUTH TRIAD
| ||||||
|
2008
|
|
2009
| ||||
|
|
AV
|
% Tax |
|
|
AV
|
% Tax |
|
Class 1 - All
|
256,727,292
|
1.7%
|
|
Class 1 - All
|
139,823,801
|
1.1%
|
|
Class 2 - All
|
10,080,895,857
|
68.1%
|
|
Class 2 - All
|
9,369,495,275
|
72.0%
|
|
Class 3 - All
|
283,124,556
|
1.9%
|
|
Class 3 - All
|
254,928,244
|
2.0%
|
|
Class 4 - All
|
40,475,665
|
0.3%
|
|
Class 4 - All
|
35,589,380
|
0.3%
|
|
Class 5 - All
|
3,951,267,476
|
26.7%
|
|
Class 5 - All
|
3,066,221,489
|
23.6%
|
|
Class 6 - All
|
115,236,840
|
0.8%
|
|
Class 6 - All
|
89,615,956
|
0.7%
|
|
Class 7 - All
|
916,856
|
0.0%
|
|
Class 7 - All
|
677,482
|
0.0%
|
|
Class 8 - All
|
29,113,067
|
0.2%
|
|
Class 8 - All
|
32,141,954
|
0.2%
|
|
Class 9 - All
|
34,696,254
|
0.2%
|
|
Class 9 - All
|
28,898,094
|
0.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
14,792,453,863
|
100.0%
|
|
Total
|
13,017,391,675
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NORTH TRIAD
| ||||||
|
2008
|
|
2009
| ||||
|
|
AV
|
% Tax |
|
|
AV
|
% Tax |
|
Class 1 - All
|
212,676,731
|
0.9%
|
|
Class 1 - All
|
120,757,902
|
0.6%
|
|
Class 2 - All
|
15,616,351,765
|
66.0%
|
|
Class 2 - All
|
14,281,296,304
|
69.5%
|
|
Class 3 - All
|
442,436,551
|
1.9%
|
|
Class 3 - All
|
398,750,371
|
1.9%
|
|
Class 4 - All
|
90,882,903
|
0.4%
|
|
Class 4 - All
|
80,023,797
|
0.4%
|
|
Class 5 - All
|
7,157,396,848
|
30.2%
|
|
Class 5 - All
|
5,557,682,869
|
27.0%
|
|
Class 6 - All
|
137,994,951
|
0.6%
|
|
Class 6 - All
|
111,390,787
|
0.5%
|
|
Class 7 - All
|
241,120
|
0.0%
|
|
Class 7 - All
|
398,017
|
0.0%
|
|
Class 8 - All
|
|
0.0%
|
|
Class 8 - All
|
|
0.0%
|
|
Class 9 - All
|
11,845,913
|
0.1%
|
|
Class 9 - All
|
10,903,696
|
0.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
23,669,826,782
|
100.0%
|
|
Total
|
20,561,203,743
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY TRIAD
| ||||||
|
2008
|
|
2009
| ||||
|
|
AV
|
% Tax |
|
|
AV
|
% Tax |
|
Class 1 - All
|
383,909,602
|
1.1%
|
|
Class 1 - All
|
305,200,662
|
1.0%
|
|
Class 2 - All
|
19,339,573,551
|
56.9%
|
|
Class 2 - All
|
18,311,981,062
|
58.2%
|
|
Class 3 - All
|
1,602,768,576
|
4.7%
|
|
Class 3 - All
|
1,812,850,308
|
5.8%
|
|
Class 4 - All
|
92,375,650
|
0.3%
|
|
Class 4 - All
|
79,069,230
|
0.3%
|
|
Class 5 - All
|
12,359,536,829
|
36.4%
|
|
Class 5 - All
|
10,720,243,858
|
34.1%
|
|
Class 6 - All
|
57,665,606
|
0.2%
|
|
Class 6 - All
|
40,656,272
|
0.1%
|
|
Class 7 - All
|
27,315,864
|
0.1%
|
|
Class 7 - All
|
39,696,528
|
0.1%
|
|
Class 8 - All
|
|
0.0%
|
|
Class 8 - All
|
|
0.0%
|
|
Class 9 - All
|
131,972,159
|
0.4%
|
|
Class 9 - All
|
127,741,650
|
0.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
33,995,117,837
|
100.0%
|
|
Total
|
31,437,439,570
|
100.0%
|
Source: Cook County Assessor’s Office, Final Abstract of 2008 Assessment and Final Abstract of 2009 Assessment
The most likely explanation for this shift in the composition of the assessment base is the implementation of new levels of assessment for the various classes of property during the 2009 assessment year and the subsequent appeals filed at the Cook County Board of Review. In 2008, the Cook County Board of Commissioners amended the County’s Real Property Assessment Classification Ordinance to revise all assessment levels to either 10% or 25% of fair market value. The following changes were implemented for the 2009 assessment year:
|
Class
|
Property Type
|
New Level of |
Old Level of |
|
1
|
Vacant Land
|
10
|
22
|
|
2
|
Residential
|
10
|
16
|
|
3 |
Apartments |
16 (2009) |
20 |
|
4
|
Non-Profit
|
25
|
30
|
|
5A
|
Commercial
|
25
|
38
|
|
5B
|
Industrial
|
25
|
36
|
|
Incentives
|
Various
|
10
|
16
|
Additionally, the Cook County Board of Review initiated “Restoration Appeals” in order to allow property owners to make their case for consistent market values after the new levels of assessment were implemented. These appeals were filed by many commercial and industrial property owners to obtain the benefit of the reduced assessment levels.
It is important to note that changes in the composition of the assessment base are beyond the control of school districts. School districts have control only over their levies, which were limited by the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law (PTELL) to an increase of only 0.1% for 2009. Thus, it is the assessment and assessment review processes that determine who pays how much of those levies.
More Information
- Ares G. Dalianis
agd@franczek.com
312.786.6163 - Scott R. Metcalf
srm@franczek.com
312.786.6104

